Richard Dawkins thinks there might be something in this (he calls it the proximate explanation) but considers the Darwinian ultimate explanation to be of greater significance; i.e. what would be the natural selection pressure that favoured development of godcentres or godspots in the first place?
However, for those involved in the campaign to diminish the influence of religion in modern life surely the reverse is true. Proving the proximate explanation would be of great importance. If it could be shown that religious people preach and act under the influence of a particular form of neurological activity rather than divine revelation it would strike a powerful blow for atheism and humanism.